Color tools

Color Blindness Simulator

Preview any palette or image as people with each type of color vision deficiency see it, and catch color pairs that become hard to tell apart.

  • Free foreverNo trial, no paywall, no usage limits.
  • No sign-upOpen the page and start. We never ask for an email to use a tool.
  • PrivateEverything runs in your browser. Your input is never uploaded or stored on our servers.
  • Works offlineOnce the page has loaded, the tool keeps working without a connection.
Paste brand or chart colors and find the pairs people with color blindness cannot tell apart.Open a screenshot, chart or photo. It is processed on your device and never uploaded.
Applies to the -anomaly types (weak cones). 0% is typical vision, 100% equals the matching -anopia (missing cones). Most people with anomalous trichromacy are mild to moderate.
60%

Your colors

Up to 12 colors in any CSS syntax: one per line, or separated by commas or spaces.
Clear
Perceptual distance (OKLab × 100). About 2 is barely noticeable for big swatches side by side; below roughly 10, small chart marks and legend dots get hard to match. Raise it for small marks, lower it for large color areas.
10

How each type of color vision sees it

Simulated with the Machado, Oliveira and Fernandes (2009) model in linear RGB. A model of average perception, not a guarantee for every individual.
  • Typical visionTrichromatic color vision, for reference.
  • DeuteranomalyThe most common type: green-sensitive cones respond more like red ones, so reds, oranges, yellows and greens drift together.Weak green · 60%
    2 hard pairs
    Show pairs
    • #3b82f6 · #a855f7ΔE 16 → 4.3
    • #22c55e · #f59e0bΔE 23 → 9.0
  • ProtanomalyRed-sensitive cones respond more like green ones. Reds look duller and darker, and red-green pairs get harder to separate.Weak red · 60%
    2 hard pairs
    Show pairs
    • #3b82f6 · #a855f7ΔE 16 → 5.1
    • #22c55e · #f59e0bΔE 23 → 6.5
  • DeuteranopiaNo working green-sensitive cones. Red and green collapse into similar olive and ochre tones; blues stay distinct.No green
    3 hard pairs
    Show pairs
    • #3b82f6 · #a855f7ΔE 16 → 0.9
    • #ef4444 · #22c55eΔE 36 → 7.4
    • #22c55e · #f59e0bΔE 23 → 9.2
  • ProtanopiaNo working red-sensitive cones. Reds look dark, almost black-brown, and confuse with greens and browns.No red
    2 hard pairs
    Show pairs
    • #3b82f6 · #a855f7ΔE 16 → 5.5
    • #22c55e · #f59e0bΔE 23 → 5.7
  • TritanomalyRare. Blue-sensitive cones respond weakly, so blue and green, and yellow and pink, become harder to tell apart.Weak blue · 60%
    All distinct
  • TritanopiaRare. No working blue-sensitive cones: blues look teal or gray, yellows look pink or light gray.No blue
    All distinct
  • AchromatopsiaVery rare complete color blindness: only lightness is seen, like a grayscale photo. A good test that your design does not rely on hue at all.No color
    7 hard pairs
    Show pairs
    • #ef4444 · #3b82f6ΔE 35 → 0.6
    • #ef4444 · #a855f7ΔE 29 → 1.2
    • #22c55e · #f59e0bΔE 23 → 1.7
    • #3b82f6 · #a855f7ΔE 16 → 1.8
    • #a855f7 · #64748bΔE 22 → 4.5
    • #ef4444 · #64748bΔE 25 → 5.7
    • #3b82f6 · #64748bΔE 16 → 6.3
4 of 6 types have hard-to-tell-apart pairs4 of 6 color vision deficiency types have hard-to-tell-apart pairs. Add labels, patterns or lightness differences.

Want a site designed with this level of care? Talk to our team

Quick answer

Color blindness, or color vision deficiency (CVD), usually means one of the eye's three cone types is missing or shifted, so certain colors look alike; in rare achromatopsia no cones work and only lightness is seen. Red-green types affect about 8% of men and 0.5% of women of Northern European ancestry. Playxoft's free Color Blindness Simulator shows any palette or image through seven types of color vision, using the Machado et al. (2009) model, and warns about pairs that become hard to tell apart.

  • 7 color vision types
  • Severity slider
  • Machado 2009 model
  • Hard-pair warnings
  • Image split compare
  • Runs on your device
  • PNG download

How to use the Color Blindness Simulator

  1. 1Choose Palette to test a set of colors, or Image to test a screenshot, chart or photo.
  2. 2Paste your colors in any CSS format, or drop an image. Images are processed on your device and never uploaded.
  3. 3Set Anomaly severity for the weak-cone types; 100% equals the full -opia form.
  4. 4Check the warnings: Show pairs lists colors that fall below your Warn below ΔE threshold.
  5. 5In image mode, drag the divider to compare, switch to All types, or download the simulated PNG.

What are the types of color blindness?

Typical color vision uses three cone types: L (long wavelength, "red"), M (medium, "green") and S (short, "blue"). Color vision deficiency (CVD) happens when one type is missing (the "-opia" forms, also called dichromacy) or has its sensitivity shifted (the "-anomaly" forms, anomalous trichromacy).

TypeCone affectedColors that get confusedHow common
DeuteranomalyM shiftedReds, oranges, yellows and greensMost common: about 5% of men
ProtanomalyL shiftedRed–green; reds look dimmerAbout 1% of men
DeuteranopiaM missingRed–greenAbout 1% of men
ProtanopiaL missingRed–green; red looks dark, almost blackAbout 1% of men
Tritanomaly / tritanopiaS shifted or missingBlue–green, yellow–pinkRare; men and women equally
AchromatopsiaNo working conesAll hues; only lightness is seenAbout 1 in 30,000 people

Red-green deficiencies are inherited on the X chromosome, which is why they are far more common in men: about 8% of men and 0.5% of women of Northern European ancestry, with rates varying between populations. Tritan defects are not X-linked, so they affect men and women equally. Because these figures are commonly cited as rounded estimates, treat them as orders of magnitude rather than precise counts.

How does this simulator work?

It uses the physiologically based model by Machado, Oliveira and Fernandes (IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2009), which models anomalous trichromacy as a shift in a cone's spectral sensitivity and dichromacy as the limit of that shift. The authors published one 3×3 matrix per severity from 0.0 to 1.0 in steps of 0.1; this tool interpolates between them for the severity slider.

The matrices operate on linear RGB, so each pixel is first decoded from the sRGB transfer curve, multiplied, clipped and re-encoded. Skipping the linearization, a common shortcut, distorts the result. Achromatopsia maps every color to its relative luminance.

Deuteranopia (severity 1.0), linear RGB
[ 0.367322   0.860646  -0.227968 ]
[ 0.280085   0.672501   0.047413 ]
[-0.011820   0.042940   0.968881 ]

Any simulator shows a model of *average* perception. Individuals vary, and single-matrix models are least certain for tritan defects. Use it to catch design problems, never to diagnose: only an eye care professional can test color vision.

What does the hard-to-tell-apart warning mean?

For every pair in your palette, the simulator measures perceptual distance in OKLab (scaled by 100, so it reads like the familiar ΔE). A pair is flagged when it is clearly different with typical vision but drops below your threshold after simulation.

About 2 is the smallest difference you can see between two large swatches side by side. Small marks such as chart lines, map regions and legend dots need far more, which is why the default threshold is 10. Raise it if your colors appear as thin lines or small dots; lower it for large blocks of color.

Watch the Achromatopsia row too. It shows lightness alone, so any pair it flags differs only in hue. Making those colors differ in lightness is the single most effective fix: it helps every type of color vision at once, and grayscale printing as a bonus.

How do I design for color blindness?

The rule behind WCAG success criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color: color must never be the *only* way information is conveyed. In practice:

  • Add a second cue. Pair status colors with icons and words ("Error: card declined"), give chart series different marker shapes or dash patterns, and underline links in body text.
  • Label directly. Put labels on chart lines and pie slices instead of relying on a color legend alone.
  • Vary lightness, not just hue. Pairs with a clear lightness difference survive every deficiency.
  • Avoid problem pairs with similar lightness: red–green, green–brown, green–orange, blue–purple and pink–gray. For good and bad, blue and orange is a safer pair than green and red.
  • Start from a tested palette. The Okabe–Ito palette (#E69F00, #56B4E9, #009E73, #F0E442, #0072B2, #D55E00, #CC79A7, #000000) was designed for color-blind readers; for heatmaps, perceptually uniform maps such as viridis hold up well.

Then check readability with the color contrast checker: good contrast and good color-blind design reinforce each other.

Frequently asked questions

Deuteranomaly, a shifted green-sensitive cone, is the most common type, affecting about 5% of men of Northern European ancestry. It makes reds, oranges, yellows and greens harder to tell apart, with severity ranging from barely noticeable to strong.
Yes, but red-green color blindness is much rarer in women, about 0.5% compared with about 8% of men of Northern European ancestry, because the genes involved are on the X chromosome. Blue-yellow (tritan) deficiencies affect men and women equally.
No. The image is decoded and processed on a canvas in your own browser, and nothing is sent anywhere. Very large images are scaled down to 1600 pixels on the longest edge to keep the preview fast.
Good simulators such as the Machado et al. (2009) model used here match the average perception of people with each deficiency well enough to catch design problems. Individual vision varies, and tritan simulation is less certain, so treat the result as a design check rather than an exact view.
In protanopia the red-sensitive L cones are missing, so the person sees with two cone types. In protanomaly the L cones are present but their sensitivity is shifted toward green, causing milder confusion. The same distinction applies to deuteranopia and deuteranomaly, and tritanopia and tritanomaly.
Avoid relying on pairs of similar lightness that differ mainly in red versus green: red and green, green and brown, green and orange, and also blue and purple. Make paired colors differ clearly in lightness, and always add labels, icons or patterns.
No. It simulates color vision deficiency for design checks. Diagnosing color vision requires standard tests such as Ishihara plates or an anomaloscope, administered by an eye care professional.

Last updated by the Playxoft engineering team.

From the designers who built this tool

Want your site to look this polished?

Consistent color, crisp typography and fast pages are what make a site feel premium. We build accessible, high-converting websites with design systems that stay consistent everywhere. Send us your site and we will share honest recommendations, free.